This entry was posted on
December 29, 2009 by Mike Robertson.
It was tagged with
Anatomy.
Pectoralis major
Justin Ware and I were talking about pec strains the other day, so I
figured this would be an opportune time to discuss how pec strains come
about in the gym.
Now, keep in mind (as many are more than willing to note) I'm not a
therapist, so I'm not going to discuss treatment strategies. Rather,
let's discuss how pec strains come about in the first place, as well as how
to avoid them.
The pec strains that I've seen over the years can typically be traced
back to one of two issues:
1 - Poor programming which leads to overuse, and/or
2 - Scapular instability
Let's discuss each a little bit more in depth.
With regards to programming, it's like anything else - a lot of issues
arise when you increase volume, intensity, or both, too quickly. Runners are notorious for
this.
You see it time and again - little Johnny reads about the "blow up your
pectacles" or "increase your bench 50 pounds in 2 months" and goes from 15
sets of bench in a workout to 30. It's amazing what the body can
adapt to, but every body has its threshold. All those stupid things
you do over the course of months and/or years will come back to haunt
you.
If you're reading this blog, I'm assuming you already know that
structural balance is important. As well, you also realize that you
have to be judicious when raising volume and intensity, so let's look at #2
instead.
Scapular instability is another huge cause of pec strains. You'll
see this quite often in bench pressing - you should be able to keep your
scapulae retracted and depressed throughout the set. If you are
unable to do this, you've reached what many would call technical
failure. This is a critical component of training that many
overlook.
Your prime movers might be able to crank out more reps, but you lack
the appropriate stability to do so safely and effectively. Going
beyond technical failure is where many pec strains occur - you exceed your
body's ability to appropriately stabilize your scapulae, and the pec gets
overloaded.
This is why getting a hand-off is so important; you want to set up nice
and tight through the upper back. Not getting a hand-off often
results in "pushing" the bar out of the supports, versus "pulling" it
out. This is a very subtle distinction (and one I stole from Dave
Tate), but it makes a huge difference in your stability throughout the set.
If you "push" the weight out, you often lose your scapular position and
stability. "Pulling" the weight out, along with a hand-off, keeps you
in the appropriate scapular position throughout.
Injuries are a part of the iron-game; if you push things hard enough
(and long enough), chances are an injury will crop up at some point in
time. However, smart training and adherence to basic principles will
go a long way to keeping you healthier and stronger for a lifetime.
Stay strong
MR
(If you'd like more info on the bench press, check out the following
articles: Defending the Bench Press and Yo, How Much Ya
Bench?)
This entry was posted on
December 17, 2009 by Mike Robertson.
It was tagged with
Anatomy and
Training.
Billy Wagner
The other day I was perusing my Facebook inbox, and read over the
following message:
Mike -
I have been enjoying your Assess and Correct program and learning lots.
Thanks so much.
Had a little problem with a group of 8th and 9th grade softball girls
that just started with us. They all are very weak and none of them could do
one good push-up. We started them with Blast Strap rows and Incline BB
Push-ups and got this email:
"This is Dad X, Player
Y's dad. Player Ys pitching coach (TC) believes that push-ups and pull-ups
put to much stress on the rotor cuff. Any chance the coaches could give her
a different exercise/drill? Could you please pass this on.
Thanks for your help and time.
Dad X"
This coach was looking for some insight, so my first thought was to ask
Eric Cressey, who works almost exclusively with baseball players these
days. This first snippet is a quote from his upcoming chapter on
baseball testing and assessment:
"One thing I mention to all my baseball players is that it is important
to realize throwing a baseball can hardly be considered a natural
act. In fact, the velocities one encounters during overhead throwing
of the baseball are actually the fastest encountered in sports.
During acceleration, the humerus internally can rotate at velocities faster
than 7,000°/s (1), while the elbow may extend at greater than
2,300°/s (2). This act of acceleration imposes tremendous
stresses on osseous, musculotendinous, ligamentous, and labral structures
at the elbow and shoulder girdle. These stresses are magnified with
throwing off the mound as compared with flat-ground throwing."
But Eric goes a little further as well:
7,000 degrees per second is the SINGLE FASTEST MOTION IN
SPORTS!!!! And they're worried about pull-ups and push-ups? The
cuff really takes the most abuse in the extreme cocking/lay-back postion
and at ball release (although it is working in the middle a lot, too) -
both of which constitute an end-range-of-motion. Pull-ups and push-ups
don't hit those extremes.
It's shocking to me that some coaches still buy into myths such as this
one. Assuming that a properly executed push-up is possibly more
injurious than throwing is ludicrous. If we want to take it to the
extreme, how are we going to tell kids to get up off the floor? You'd
better not lay on your stomach and do a push-up to get up, lest you injure
your rotator cuff in the process!
But, I digress.
It's interesting that exercises such as push-ups and pull-ups
(closed-chain activities which actually increase 'cuff and stabilizer activation) are
demonized, while bench presses and lat pulldowns are key constituents of
many beginner training programs. For almost any athlete, push-ups and
pull-ups should be key components of their general preparation. As
mentioned above they are actually quite "shoulder friendly," but they also
build total body-awareness, strength, and motor control.
If you (or the pitching coach) wants to have a better understanding of
how the scapulae and rotator cuff work together to promote functional,
pain-free movement at the shoulder I'd highly recommend checking out Bill
and I's previous article Push-ups, Face Pulls and Shrugs. Not only do we
look at the biomechanics and functional anatomy, but we review quite a bit
of research as well.
If I could make only one suggestion with regards to this coaches
programming, I would remove the blast strap rows for the time being.
If these girls are really this week, I would imagine that their core
stability/strength is poor, as is their upper back strength. Give
them a stable environment (such as a traditional inverted row) to begin
with until their strength comes around.
Good luck with your training, and hopefully the girls understand what a
great coach they have!
Best
MR
This entry was posted on
July 21, 2009 by Mike Robertson.
It was tagged with
Anatomy and
Training.
Kurt Warner
It seems as though hip pain and dysfunction is a real hot topic as of
late. I can’t tell you how many e-mail inquiries, as well as
new clients, I’ve seen in the past couple of months that dealt with
some sort of hip dysfunction.
Not surprisingly, as we become
better at diagnosing hip issues, it seems as though more and more people
are opting to undergo hip surgery versus exploring more conservative
therapies. I don’t have stats to back this up, but it
definitely seems to be the case. Add into the mix that professional
athletes like Kurt Warner, Alex Rodriguez and Carolos Delagdo have
undergone hip arthroscopies in the past year, and it’s no wonder why
the hip is quickly becoming a hotly discussed joint.
In many
cases, hip dysfunction can be misdiagnosed due to where the actual pain is
noted. For instance, hip dysfunction can obviously lead to hip pain,
but lack of control and strength from the hips can also lead to lower back
and knee pain as well. In poorly designed interventions, the focus is
put on the site of the pain, versus the site of the underlying problem.
What’s more, while many people are quick to talk about hip
mobility, hip strength and motor control are imperative as well. I
often describe the hips as the functional centerpiece of our body.
In my opinion, restoring hip function is a two-step process:
1
– Restore motor control to the dysfunctional muscle group(s)
2 – Regaining strength, both in isolated and integrated
movements
When discussing hip motor control/strength
dysfunction, we’re generally discussing the psoas, glute max, and/or
posterior gluteus medius. When a client or athlete lacks the
necessary strength or motor control, this often leads to synergistic
dominance (the wrong muscle performing the desired movement), increased
likelihood of injury, decreased strength and performance, and increased
wear and tear to the joint.
Obviously, there’s a lot more
to the equation than what I’ve outlined here, but this is a topic
I’ll be discussing in more depth going forward. For more
information on this topic, as well as how to get those hips fixed up and
moving appropriately, be sure to check out my article “Hips Don’t
Lie,” as well as the Assess and Correct DVD and manual which will
be released later this year.
Stay strong
MR
This entry was posted on
July 14, 2009 by .
It was tagged with
Anatomy.
No more shoulder pain...
Last week, I evaluated a potential new client at IFAST. She was in
fantastic shape overall, as she’d already been exercising for over 5
years straight.
The problem, however, was her shoulders –
she was complaining of poor mobility, and some general pain and discomfort
when exercising.
As I was going through her assessment, it took
me about 2 seconds to determine the primary problem. But, to add a
little suspense to the equation, let me begin by telling you what wasn't the problem.
Her pec and lat length were fine. As well, her internal and
external rotation were not only acceptable, but pretty symmetrical as
well. So that obviously wasn’t the case.
When
evaluating people with shoulder pain, you tend to see a lot of instability,
especially through the scapulae – but this wasn’t the case
here. For the most part her scapulae were stable, and her rotator
cuff tested only mildly weak.
The biggest issue in her case,
however, was her thoracic spine position. As I’ve mentioned
numerous times in the past, the thoracic spine is the foundation for your
shoulder function – if your t-spine isn’t aligned properly, you
can never get your scapulae into the appropriate positions. And when
your scapulae are out of whack, it’s only a matter of time before you
have some sort of shoulder issues.
If you’re having
shoulder issues, you absolutely, positively have to acknowledge the role of
the thoracic spine, and make sure it’s in optimal alignment.
Bill and I discussed this extensively in our Inside-Out
DVD. As well, if soft-tissue restrictions are part of the problem
be sure to check out my Soft Tissue e-manual. It’s absolutely free,
after all!
I know people want to show how smart they are and
discuss all the intimate links within the body, but sometimes the simple
answer is also the correct one. Address the t-spine in your shoulder
clients and I guarantee better results.
Stay strong
MR
< prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next >
Blog Archive
Feeling old-school? Check out the old Blogspot!